Shocking! Obama’s Muslim Brotherhood Ties Link Him Directly to Nazis

For those whose still don't see President Hussain Obama has ties to the MuslimBrotherhood....please read this and WAKE UP. 





HSo we all have pretty much accepted the fact that U.S. President Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim, and that he has direct ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, a group of terrorists responsible for carnage and mayhem in Egypt as of late that has seen the ethnic cleansing of Christians in many areas. Not long ago, Muslim Brotherhood terrorists went as far as forcing Catholic nuns to be paraded around as war prisoners. Muslim

So when did the Muslim Brotherhood start, and who was their predecessor?

Would you believe that they started way back in the 1920′s and that their model group was Adolph Hitler’s Nazis?

It’s true.

An Egyption by the name of Hassan al-Bana started the Muslim Brotherhood back in the 1920′s. Al-Bana was a devoted fan of then early Nazi party leader Adolph Hitler and he wrote letters to him frequently. Al-Bana started the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt as a youth Muslim movement that focused on the Wahhabi sect of Islam and the group abhorred any new teachings in Islam past the tenth century, claimed such teachings were false, and deemed that anyone practicing such teachings should be eradicated, even if by the use of violence.

In their early days, the Muslim Brotherhood had a lot in common with the Nazis. They hated Jews, they hated Western culture, and they hated democracy. When WWII broke out, the Muslim Brotherhood swore to see that no American or English soldiers were left alive in Alexandria or Cairo, Egypt, their strongholds at the time.

After WWII, the Muslim Brotherhood took it upon themselves to try to strangle the sovereign nation of Israel. In 1954, the Egyptian government became nervous of the Muslim Brotherhood’s radical activities and ordered that they flee the country. Many of them, through the help of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (C.I.A.) fled to Saudi Arabia. Once in Saudi Arabia, the C.I.A. would help a certain young man with leadership qualities, who his peers seemed to listen to and admire rise to the top of Muslim Brotherhood leadership. That young man’s name was Osama Bin Laden.

In 1979 the C.I.A. took top fanatics from the Muslim Brotherhood and moved them to Afghanistan to fight the Soviets who had invaded there. Word had gotten out about the link between the Muslim Brotherhood and the former Nazis, so the C.I.A. decided to change the groups name to Maktab al Khidimat il Mujahideen, which would be shortened to simply the Mujahideen in the press. This would be the parent group of the even later Taliban and Al Qaeda.

So as you can see, the poison of radical Islamic extremist groups around the world today all started in the 1920′s with the original founder of the Muslim Brotherhood who idolized Adolph Hitler and Nazi ideology.

Fast forward to today. U.S. President Barack Hussein Obama has been aiding and abetting the enemy. He has armed and funded the Al Qaeda terrorists in Syria, who he chooses to call “rebels.” These are the same Al Qaeda terrorists that U.S. forces in Iraq ran out of northern Iraq, for slaughtering the Kurds and other Iraq civilians during the Iraq War, only to now see them armed and funded by a U.S. president.

President Hussein Obama has placed individuals with direct links to the Muslim Brotherhood into his cabinet, such as Arif Alikhan, who serves as assistant secretary of Homeland Security for policy development; Mohammed Elibiary, who is a member of the Homeland Security Advisory Council; Rashad Hussain, who is the U.S. special envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference; Salam al-Marayati, who is co-founder of the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC); Imam Mohamed Magid, who is president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA); and Eboo Patel, who is a member of President Obama’s Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships..

Most recently, in a complete show of arrogance and his true ideology of man controlled by the State at all costs, he has allowed the U.S. government to shut down, close its doors and windows, as opposed to compromise and allow the people of America to have their own say in their choice of health care providers.

All arrows point to the fact that not only is U.S. President Barack Hussein Obama a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, but that he is an ardent, die hard Nazi.

http://freepatriot.org/2013/10/02/shocking-obamas-muslim-brotherhood-ties-link-directly-nazis/

1,000 Jurists to EU: Settlements are Legal

Mammoth petition delivered to Catherine Ashton states: ’1967 lines’ don’t exist.

A mammoth jurists’ petition delivered to European Union foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton states that the EU is wrong in holding that Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria are illegal, and that the term “1967 lines” does not exist in international law.

The letter is signed by over 1,000 jurists worldwide.

Among the signatories are former justice minister Prof. Yaakov Ne’eman; former UN Ambassaor Dr. Meir Rosen; Britain’s Baroness Prof. Ruth Deech, Prof. Eliav Shochetman and Prof. Talia Einhorn. They include legal scholars from the U.S., Australia, Belgium, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada, Switzerland, Chile, Czechoslovakia, Greece, India, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Malta, Holland, Norway, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, Taiwan, South Africa, Sweden and, of course, Israel.

The man behind the initiative is Dr. Alan Baker, Israel’s former ambassador to Canada and legal adviser to the Foreign Ministry, who currently heads the International Action Division of the Legal Forum for Israel.

Baker was also a member of the three-person committee headed by former Supreme Court judge Edmond Levy, known as the Levy Committee, which pronounced that Judea and Samaria were not occupied territory.

Dr. Baker explained to Arutz Sheva that there is “no such thing” as the 1967 lines. “There never was such a thing. The matter of the borders is on the agenda of the negotiations, The EU cannot dictate a subject that is on the agenda of the negotiations. The pre-1967 lines are (1949) armistice lines. These are not recognized lines or security lines. In the Oslo process, it was agreed between us and the Palestinians that the matter of borders will be negotiated. The term ’1967 lines’ does not appear anywhere in our agreement with the Palestinians, therefore it is a legal and factual aberration to determine that these are our lines.”

“The second thing is the determination that the settlements are illegal according to international law. It is true that most of the world thinks so, but that does not make it true legally. Legally, the clause in the Geneva Convention that they use to say that settlements are illegal, was not intended to refer to cases like our settlements, but to prevent the forced transfer of populations by the Nazis. This is not relevant to the Israeli settlements.”

source

Op-Ed: Four Views on Israel's Concerns with the 1967 Lines

When working on reviving the defunct Arab Peace Initiative, why is Israel so concerned about the demand to return to 1967 lines?

The Fallacy of the "1967 Borders" – No Such Borders Ever Existed

- Amb. Alan Baker

With ongoing and increasing intensity, the Palestinian leadership is fixated on advancing a concerted policy vis-à-vis the international community and public opinion, demanding recognition of what they claim to be the "1967 borders," and acceptance of a unilaterally declared Palestinian state within those borders. There are no provisions in any of the agreements signed between Israel and the Palestinians that require withdrawal to the "1967 borders." There were never any geographic imperatives that sanctify the 1967 lines.(Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs)

"Land Swaps" and the 1967 Lines

- Amb. Dore Gold

Several months after Israel captured the West Bank and Gaza in the 1967 Six-Day War, the UN Security Councildefined the territorial terms of a future peace settlement in Resolution 242, which over the decades became the cornerstone for all Arab-Israeli diplomacy. Resolution 242 made clear that Israel was not expected to withdraw from all the territories that came into its possession, meaning that Israel was not required to withdraw from 100 percent of the West Bank. Moreover, neither Resolution 242 nor any subsequent signed agreements with the Palestinians stipulated that Israel would have to pay for any West Bank land it would retain by handing over its own sovereign land in exchange. (Weekly Standard)

See also The Long View in Israel Against the 1967 Lines

- Amb. Dore Gold

Israel's greatest strategic minds have long opposed the 1967 lines.(Los Angeles Times)

The Arab Peace Initiative: A Primer and Future Prospects

- Dr. Joshua Teitelbaum

While several aspects of the Arab Peace Initiative represent significant and positive developments in the official, collective Arab view of the future of Israel in the Middle East, Israel should refrain from accepting the initiative as a basis for peace negotiations because it contains seriously objectionable elements.(Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs)

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/

Posted with Blogsy