Showing posts with label Poland. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Poland. Show all posts

Tuesday, 12 November 2013

First Look at Museum of Polish Jews


When Warsaw’s Museum of the History of Polish Jews’ main exhibition opens to the public in September 2014, it will add to the city’s Jewish historical trail something which does not presently exist: a history of Jewish life.




The core exhibition has been in development since 2003, when the master plan, including the concept and narrative line, was first conceived. Created and curated by an international team of more than 120 scholars led by Professor Barbara Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, Professor of Performance Studies at New York University, the multimedia narrative exhibition will consume the 43,000 square-feet of space located beneath the lobby of the museum. The 1000-year story the exhibit will tell is, Deputy Director of the Museum Zygmunt Stępiński told the Forward, “a unique moment and unique example of Jewish life” in Europe.

In the absence of source materials — the physical evidence of Judaism in Poland having been largely erased during the 20th century — the core exhibit will utilize interactive, theatrical, and textual elements to immerse visitors in the story. Thus, when visitors enter the first gallery, they will find themselves in a poetic forest, where tales and legends of the first Jewish settlers in Poland are to be carved onto the trees and projected onto the floor.

Following the medieval gallery examining the life of the Jewish merchant, the second gallery brings the history up to 1500 when, during the period of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, Poland was becoming the centre of the Ashkenazic world. The exhibition will make available to visitors a Virtual Library where they will be able to explore the earliest Hebrew and Yiddish texts printed on Polish soil, as well as an interactive scale model of Krakow and Kazimierz.

A centrepiece of the core exhibition, Stępiński explained as we toured the museum, will be a reconstruction inspired by the wooden synagogue that once stood in the shtetl of Gwoździec, near Lviv. Its timber frame — which rises through a gap in the roof of the core exhibit so that it is visible in the entrance hall — has been erected using methods and tools designed to replicate those used in the 17th century. For the painted, decorative ceiling, similarly authentic in its recreation, the museum used the interiors of churches of the period for reference, there being no traces of Gwoździec’s synagogue left, it having been burnt to the ground during the Shoah.

The fate of the synagogue of Gwoździec portends a greater problem with fashioning an exhibit about Jewish life in Poland, namely, how to integrate the Holocaust and the deaths of 3 million Polish Jews — 90% of Polish Jewry — into the larger story. Kirshenblatt-Gimblett told the Forward that what the exhibit will say is that the Holocaust was not the inevitable outcome of the Jewish story in Poland. “It is not historically accurate to present the Holocaust as the logical outcome of Polish anti-Semitism,” she said.

“For Jews in Poland at the end of the interwar years, there was no genocide on the horizon. Poland did not believe they were about to be invaded in 1939. They had no idea of what was coming,” Kirshenblatt-Gimblett continued. “The Holocaust will be presented within the 1000-year history of Polish Jews, showing specifically what happened here in Poland in the borders of the Second Polish republic.”

As such the exhibition will, as Moshe Rosman, Associate Professor of Jewish History at Bar-Ilan University, has outlined, present the Shoah as a Nazi project, not a Polish one. “While not hesitating to show Polish anti-Semitism in its manifold manifestations, the Museum asserts that this had nothing to do with the German Nazi Final Solution. The Holocaust was of a whole different order. Genocide was not the objective of even the most rabid Polish anti-Semites, in any period,” Rosman writes.

As a response to the recent scholarship of historians like Jan T. Gross who have highlighted the role of Polish civilians in the Shoah, the core exhibition will be inherently controversial, running counter to the way in which Holocaust studies as a field understands Jewish history in Poland. Instead of presenting the story of Polish Jews teleologically, with the Holocaust as the end point, the Museum of the History of Polish Jews will have the Shoah be one chapter in a 1000-year narrative — neither the beginning nor end. “Holocaust studies reads history backwards,” Kirshenblatt-Gimblett said. “We will do the opposite.”

Indeed, the core exhibition will also assert that the Holocaust is not the final chapter of the history of Polish Jewry. Having exited the Holocaust gallery and passed through a void — a space for reflection and contemplation — the gallery on postwar history will shed light upon the efforts of those who survived to uncover what had been lost, only to be confronted with local violence and the anti-Semitic campaigns of 1968 that encouraged emigration to western Europe, North America and Israel. Only the fall of communism in 1989 would encourage a re-emergence of Judaism in Poland, which continues unto the present.

Previews of the core exhibition are presently being outlined to the Jewish community of Warsaw and those interested in the Jewish past there through a series of lectures, the first of which were given by Professors Kirshenblatt-Gimblett and Rosman at the end of October. When it is complete and open to the public, both the museum’s striking architecture and the vision of this exhibition has the potential to make the Museum of the History of Polish Jews one of the great Jewish museums of the world, comparable to Berlin, Prague, and the National Museum of American Jewish History in Philadelphia.

But with so much death, is it really possible to tell a story of life? Kirshenblatt-Gimblett compared it to the practice of sitting shiva — when one talks about the departed, one “shares the stories of how they lived.”


Read more: source


Tuesday, 30 July 2013

United States Presses Israel to Release Murderers but won’t release Pollard


[J4JP Disclaimer: Recirculation of this article should not be construed as
an endorsement, in whole or in part, of the author’s statements regarding
the current peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians, being led by
the US. J4JP categorically rejects all American efforts aimed at exploiting
the plight of Jonathan Pollard for use as a bargaining chip against Israel.
The US is obliged to release Pollard as a matter of simple justice. We
appreciate the author’s strong, clear statements about the injustice of
Jonathan Pollard’s sentence and his encouraging President Obama to do the
right thing by commuting Jonathan Pollard’s grossly disproportionate
sentence to time served. ]

The Israeli cabinet took a courageous and politically unpopular step by
approving the release of 104 Palestinian prisoners, including many
terrorists who had murdered Israeli babies, women, the elderly and other
civilians.  According to Israeli intelligence some of these released
murderers are likely to rejoin terrorist organizations and may kill again.
Relatives and friends of the victims have protested the decision to release
these killers.  Yet Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his
cabinet withstood these pressures and ordered their release.

The United States government had pressured the Israeli government to release
these prisoners because the Palestinian Authority had made their release a
condition to resuming peace talks.  The Israeli government, which had agreed
to peace talks with no preconditions, submitted to the Palestinian
precondition, and talks are now likely to go forward.

Prime Minister Netanyahu had reportedly asked the Obama Administration to
make it easier for him to release Palestinian murderers by releasing
Jonathan Pollard, who has already served 28 years for spying for Israel.  No
American in history has ever come close to serving that long—indeed none has
ever served a double digit sentence—for spying for an American ally.
Moreover, there were grave doubts about the lawfulness of Pollard’s
sentence, as evidenced by the strong words of the dissenting judge who
characterized the government’s breach of the plea agreement as a
“fundamental miscarriage of justice requiring relief…”

But the Obama Administration slammed the door in Netanyahu’s face by
categorically rejecting the request to commute Pollard’s sentence to the
excessive term he has already served.  Despite this rebuff from the Obama
Administration, Netanyahu agreed to release the prisoners.  Now the
Palestinian Authority is asking for more prisoners to be released including
some of the most dangerous terrorists on the face of the earth.  The United
States will probably continue to put pressure on Israel to risk the lives of
its own civilians by releasing more Palestinian terrorists in order to get
the Palestinians to continue to negotiate.

The time has come—indeed it is well passed—for the United States to do the
right thing with regard to Jonathan Pollard.  Pollard poses no continuing
danger to America, since he has not had access to our secrets for nearly 30
years.  Unlike the Palestinian prisoners who are to be released, he has
expressed regret over his actions and has sought forgiveness.  Moreover, his
life sentence is excessive by any standard of justice and it violated the
government’s plea bargain which promised, in exchange for Pollard’s guilty
plea, not to seek life imprisonment.

Peace between Israel and the Palestinians requires the active involvement of
the United States, as evidenced by Secretary John Kerry’s intensive efforts
to bring the parties together.  But if peace is in our national interest, as
the Obama Administration insists it is, and if peace requires sacrifice by
both Israel and the Palestinians, then we too must be willing to give a
little.  Releasing Jonathan Pollard after requiring him to serve 27 years,
some in solitary confinement, is not much of a sacrifice to ask of the
United States.  It is the least we can do to make it easier for Israel to
make far greater sacrifices and take far more dangerous risks in order to
secure peace.

The request to release Pollard now has bipartisan support in the United
States and multi-partisan support in Israel.  Knesset members on all sides
of the Israeli political spectrum have called for Pollard’s release as a way
of encouraging the peace process.  “It’s a window of opportunity of good
will to Israeli, who are not going through an easy time,” said Labor MK
Nachman Shai.  “It would build up public support for negotiations and show
that the US also understands the gravity of this historic moment.”

American political leaders from both sides of the aisle, as well as from all
religious backgrounds, have called for Pollard’s release on compassionate
grounds, based on the length of his sentence and his deteriorating physical
condition.

Israel will go forward with negotiations regardless of whether Pollard is
released, because the Israeli government wants a peaceful resolution that
assures security.  But in the end the Israeli public will have to vote for
any deal struck between Israeli and Palestinian negotiators, with the help
of American negotiators.  The outcome of any such referendum will depend on
whether Israeli voters believe that their security has been assured and that
the United States continues to stand behind them.  Releasing Jonathan
Pollard—as a gesture of good will, as a show of American support, and in the
interests of justice and compassion—will go a long way toward encouraging
the Israeli public to vote in favor of a peace agreement that requires great
sacrifices on their part.
http://www.jpost.com/premium/premiumzone.aspx

related
Abbas: negotiations will focus in beginning on borders and security :: Abbas said that no Israeli settlers or border forces could remain in a future Palestinian state

Thursday, 13 June 2013

Netanyahu in Poland: Stop Negotiating About Negotiations...Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu calls on the Palestinian Authority to come to the negotiating table without delay.


Netanyahu and government ministers in Poland
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu said on Wednesday that, when it comes to peace talks with the Palestinian Authority (PA), “it’s time to stop negotiating about the negotiations.”

Speaking during inter-governmental consultations in Poland, Netanyahu called on PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas, who has refused to talk to Israel for nearly three years, to come to the table without preconditions.

"I want peace. To achieve peace, we must negotiate peace,” he said. “We want to see this American effort succeed. Israel is ready for the resumption of direct negotiations for peace without preconditions. I think it is time to stop squabbling over preconditions. I think it's time to stop negotiating about the negotiations. I think we have to start peace talks immediately.”

Netanyahu added, “My goal is to see a historic compromise that ends the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians once and for all. This will entail a demilitarized Palestinian state that recognizes the Jewish state, with iron clad security arrangements for Israel – recognition, security, demilitarization. I believe that these are the elements for peace. I don't pose them as preconditions for negotiations. I look forward to enter those negotiations without preconditions without delay. I am ready for such a peace. I hope the Palestinians are ready too.”

Earlier Wednesday, Netanyahu backed away from making a joint statement with the Polish government that would have endorsed a Palestinian Authority state.

Netanyahu disavowed the statement, released earlier in the day by the Prime Minister’s Office and which would have expressed strong support for the "two state solution".

An aide explained that the prime minister had not gone over the text, and added, "It was written by junior-level officers in the National Security Council."

Abbas, instead of talking to Israel, has continued to impose preconditions on talks, including a demand that Israel release terrorists who were jailed before 1993, freeze construction in Judea, Samaria and eastern Jerusalem and even present a map of the future Palestinian state before any negotiations take place.

He has repeatedly ignored calls by Netanyahu to come to the negotiating table, but has been facing pressure from U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry to resume peace talks.