The "moral responsibility" of rape victims should be a topic up for discussion, with the debate over sex offences dominated by a rhetoric of weak, vulnerable, fallen women, a British barrister has said.
Yes you heard it right, Barbara Hewson, a an out of touch so called human rights barrister at Hardwicke Chambers, told a debate at LSE, entitled "Is Rape Different?" that the age-old debates over the sex trade and sex offences used Christian language - that there are "vulnerable women in danger" that "freedom was dangerous" and that women are "inherently fragile and vulnerable".
Hewson, who has previously called for the age of consent to be lowered to 13, said: “The law does not attribute any responsibility now to the victim of rape whereas traditionally we know the judge would say when they came to sentence ‘well she was contributorally negligent’ or something like that.”
Anyone getting warm as to where this is obviously leading?
"It seems to me" she went on "simply factually, we all know if you’re drunk you are more likely to have accidents. So if you fall off a bar stool and hit your head and have a serious brain injury, because you’re drunk, then people are gong to say, 'Well you chose to be drunk'.
Come on everyone you must have guessed by now?
“So there does seem to me something a little sanitised about the idea that we cannot even have a discussion about the moral responsibility, whatever people may want to say about the legal responsibility" this idiotic liberal suggested.
She suggests that it’s morally absolutely unambiguous, the victim is utterly innocent and the victimiser is utterly guilty and this is infinitesimal. Yes as unbelievable as it sounds this overpaid smug liberal is suggesting that perhaps the victim might not be innocent yet the perpetrator might not be guilty. Yes unbelievable but this is British justice 2013 style.
She continues:
"I don't think sexual abusive is widespread, I think that is highly debatable. One in three women are sexually abused, that figure would imply a crime of absolutely epic proportions which the system couldn't possibly deal with."
Well she needs to pull her liberal head from where the sun doesn't shine and look around at the thousands of rape cases in the UK and hundreds of rapes on underage children, uncovered recently up and down the Britain, rapes committed by gangs of Muslim males.
Which brings this story to its conclusion. Is this woman simply paving the way for Shira law in the UK? Does she know something we all don't? And is she just appeasing and simply laying the groundwork for a British justice system that in future won't have the 'hassle' of prosecuting these mass rapes and thus exposing a problem the liberal media and system doesn't want it's public to know about and thus roll out the red carpet for an Islamist Britain?
Earlier this year, after a barrister was criticised for describing a 13-year-old child sex abuse victim as "predatory”,Hewson came out in defence of Robert Colover, saying it "takes two to tango". She then called for the lowering of the age of consent to 13.
We will leave it to our readers to guess where it's custom to have child brides in the world?
No comments:
Post a Comment